MARKETING GOES BEYOND

Tweet

The best of products and marketing campaigns may fall fl at when it comes to the customer. And this may be despite the best of market research backing them. But a marketer who understands the customer’s mind can utilise the 4Ps strategy in a more optimal manner; leading to stupendous results

It’s turning out to be a year of new launches, making the market place more interesting and competitive. Palm launched its glitzy mobile phone “Pre” making Apple really shaky and nervous, with Apple wanting to sue it for copying the iPhone touchscreen. Microsoft has launched, rather relaunched its internet search engine with a new name Bing – planning to take Google headlong in the battle of the “searches”. Yes, this time – innovation seems to be the key to survival. But will plain innovation be enough to make a product survive?

THREE STORIES TO ILLUSTRATE

1ST STORY

100 students at MIT’s Sloan School of Management were shown an advertisement of the magazine – The Economist. It was a subscription ad, urging readers to pick the type of subscription they wanted to buy or renew. Three offers were on display:- 1st Offer: Internet subscription for $59 2nd Offer: Print subscription for $125 3rd Offer: Print and Internet subscription for $125

Out of the 100 students, 16 students opted for the first offer, zero students for the second, and 84 students went for the third offer. Now no one in their right minds would even remotely think of going for the second offer when at the same price, you got a bigger and better bargain when you selected the third offer.

So the researcher Dan Ariely decided to do away with the 2nd offer (after all no one went for it in the first round); this time again, 100 students were asked to fill up the subscription form. The results spoke a different story; 68 students chose the first offer of $59 for Internet only, while only 32 chose the $125 subscription, which offered the combination of print and Internet. While it appeared to be the most lucrative option the first time, what was it that made it look so lackluster the second time?

2ND STORY

It was a basement-run operation when it started. Today it’s grown into a huge business with branches spread all over the world. The company is Amway Corporation. The company has used a technique whose power is indisputable. It calls this BUG. Before you draw up any conclusions, the BUG in nothing but a collection of Amway products – the furniture polish, detergent, shampoo, deodorizers etc. all put together in a specially designed tray. Each salesman is trained and instructed that he has to necessarily leave this BUG in the prospects house for 24-72 hours, without charging her anything or putting her under any obligation to buy. She was just expected to try the product. When the salesperson returned to collect the free samples (BUGs), most of the customers bought at least one product. The BUG, true to its name, was working like magic. What was it that suddenly made the same products so good, that all sales shot up so fast?

3RD STORY

An owner of a jewellery store found that she was unable to sell a collection of turquoise jewellery. She tried as hard as she could, but nothing worked. As a last resort, during the peak tourist season, she asked her saleswoman to put a note on the turquoise jewellery section announcing “Everything at ½ (half) price”. As expected, everything was sold within a few days. However, the shocking part was that the saleswoman had not heard her correctly and instead of putting everything at “½” she had put them at “2x” i.e. double the price. Why did it all sell?

MIND GAMES

In the first story of “The Economist” subscription, the 2nd option of $125 for print subscription was included (even though it sounded totally illogical at first glance) to send 84 out of 100 people to reach out for the 3rd option. The 3rd option seemed like a “steal” when compared to the second. The 2nd option acted as a decoy – for when the decoy was removed the choices changed completely. As humans we always compare especially when we are not sure of what we want (and most of the times, with so many choices around adding to the confusion, we are not sure, not clear which is the best). This superbly intelligent advertisement of The Economist gently pressured us to go for the more expensive option by making it look most lucrative in comparison to the other option!

In the 2nd story of Amway’s sudden increase in sales the success had nothing to do with improved quality of the product, or price change, but rather the use of a “trick” to which mankind has succumbed to since time immemorial. It’s the magnetic power of the word “FREE”. Yes, “free anything” is always welcome. Amway combined “free” with “reciprocity”. The “reciprocity rule” says Robert Cialdini, binds us into doing something in return for a gift received by another. Amway’s “free trial” put many customers under obligation to buy – at least on product.

In the 3rd story, the unintentionally high pricing worked wonders on the minds of the buyers. High priced jewellery is always associated with high quality. So just when the owner of the jewellery shop thought that a reduction in price would rid her of these products which refused to sell, it was the obnoxiously high price that did the trick.

DID ANYONE MENTION PRODUCT?

A whole lot of new and interesting products are being launched this time. In 2005, more than 1,56,000 new products were launched, which boils down to a new product being released every 3 to 4 minutes. Yet, when it comes to remembering brand names, we remember only some and use even fewer ones. The rest all disappear sooner or later. Almost 80% of all products launched fail. Many a times they are not necessarily bad – it’s just that something fails to click in the minds of the consumers. Gone are the days when just offering a product of great quality was sufficient to ensure its success. It is the “image” that conjures up in the minds of the consumers which is most important today. We call this image – a “Brand”.

Back in 1996, British Airways went though an expensive re-branding exercise. In a bid to get a new look, the company changed the tail-fin design of its planes. Instead of sporting the colours of its National Flag, the Company started using different images – to make the airlines look more international. The British hated it. They wanted Britain’s flagship airline to look more British. Richard Branson didn’t miss the opportunity. He sensed the dissatisfaction of the people and immediately painted Union Jacks on its aircraft with the slogan – “Fly the Flag”. BA was forced to return to its old design – if it wanted to stay in business.

A supermarket operator one day realized that his cheese was not selling well. He put out the cheese and invited customers to cut off slivers – as free samples. He sold one thousand pounds of cheese in a few hours.

In today’s world, marketing is “perception building”. You need to understand why people reach out for a product. Those who have used a Nokia phone would rarely switch to a Sony Ericsson. Not because the latter is bad but because they are so used to the way Nokia phones function.

As a marketer, today your primary job is not to look at what your product has to offer but rather what is it that will motivate your target audience to buy your product.

HOW DO I KNOW WHAT WILL WORK?

Yes that’s the million dollar question. The answer to it is not easy; sometimes the quickest answer people give to this question is – do market research.

Ford Motor Company once asked Americans what features they wanted the most in their cars. Keeping all the points in mind, the company came up with the “American car”. It flopped.

In the 1970’s, Pepsi introduced the “Pepsi challenge” where consumers were blind-folded and asked to taste the two colas and give their preference. Most of the participants preferred Pepsi. Pepsi used these research findings and announced to the world that the “Pepsi generation” had arrived and Pepsi was the choice of the young and happening. A totally shaken up Coke decided to change hurriedly to keep up with the times and worked on a new flavour. The test-marketing brought a positive response from the market and in 1985, the New Coke was launched. What seemed like a flawless move turned out to be the worst blunder in the history of Coca Cola. Sometimes, consumer research fails to reveal the true emotions and passions of the people. Coca Cola was the “Real thing” and no one wanted a “New” flavour. They loved the “Old” and Coca Cola had to bring back its original flavour. The moral of the story is – marketing is a battle of perceptions, not products. So “listen” carefully. Sometimes a product may succeed even though research reveals no demand for it. Steve Jobs never, ever does any market research; yet the man and his inventions have changed the world. No amount of market research could have revealed the need for a home-computer when Steve Jobs started creating it. The consumers had no idea that a mobile phone could be made to look like an iPhone. No amount of market research would have let Akio Morita predict the thundering success of the “Walkman”. Yet all these inventions created history, or rather changed history!

A clever marketer is one who knows when to rely on his gut feel. A clever marketer is one who has his hand on the pulse of the consumer. He understands and believes that a brand is defined as “a bundle of audience perceptions about a product or service”. Gone are the days when just making a good quality product would ensure sales, gone are the days when you could beat competitors on the basis of just an ad, correct price and good distribution. Today you need to have the ability to understand the consumer’s mind and plan your 4Ps - price, product, place, promotion accordingly.
After all, marketing today goes beyond the understanding of the 4Ps.

IT’S TIME WE STARTED ADVERTISING RESPONSIBLY

Tweet

Tobacco companies have successfully used basic and simple marketing tactics for years; even if it meant irreversible damage to society. It’s high time we beat them at their own game.

It’s interesting that rotting teeth, lungs infected with cancer and a slew of other horrendous and horrifying images will adorn cigarette packets in India from this month (June onwards). Another interesting development occurred in Washington a few days back. A federal appeals court upheld a landmark 2006 ruling on 22nd May that cigarette makers for decades have been lying about the dangers of smoking “In a 93-page opinion, a three- judge panel cleared the way for new restrictions on how cigarette companies market and sell their products,” stated the Washington Post. What is it that makes marketing and selling of cigarettes so different that it required a 93-page letter to help reduce their effect, if not stop it totally? What is that that these companies have been doing that’s so harmful to our society. What weapons do they use & what’s their game plan?

POWER OF PERSUASION
Advertising and marketing are nothing but means of persuading consumers to buy the desired brand or product and it’s the tobacco industry that seems to have mastered the art over the years. For, according to some surveys, about two thousand teenagers begin to smoke each day, inspite of the fact that smoking is the number one killer in preventable deaths in a nation. Yet it’s persuasive marketing & advertising that ensures that thousands bite the bait and buy these harmful products. This happens is because cigarette companies thrive on “Image Culture” and use it to the hilt to sell their wares.

IMAGES MARKETING – THE FIRST WEAPON
The television was invented in the 1930’s and for many years, no one thought it had any use. They had the radio for their entertainment and if it tired them out, they all went to the movies. Who needed television – no one! What needed television – the economy. It needed the television to tell to the world, about life in a consumer society. It needed to show “Images” of success, progress, happiness. It’s the cigarette companies who learnt this lesson the best and used these images to camouflage the potent danger of their products. It chose its target audience cautiously and bombarded them with judiciously selected images. The target that was the best, the easiest and the fastest to convince was the “gullible teenagers”. A study revealed that what each teenager feared most was being labeled “uncool” and hence started the “marketing of cool”. This strategy proved to be most successful, for, according to 1981 internal document of Philip Morris (largest Cigarette Company in the world), “Today’s teenager is tomorrow’s potential regular customer, and the overwhelming majority of smokers first begin to smoke while still in their teens. The smoking patterns of teenagers are particularly important to Philip Morris.” With the mission & vision statement clear, cigarette companies started targeting the vulnerable minds of teenagers through marketing schemes & campaigns. They bombarded them with images of “cool”. Tobacco companies used themes that appealed to the young minds; images of fun, action, excitement. Now you could look macho if you had a Marlboro in your hands. Strand Cigarette claimed “you’re never alone with a Strand”. “I’d walk a mile for Camel,” vowed many cigarette addicts. A women was successful if she held a Virginia Slims between her beautiful fingers for “You’ve come a long way” (read achieved success) if you smoked Virginia Slims. Sex appeal; cartoon characters, movie star status – every conceivable tool was used for years by tobacco companies to convince people that if you smoked, you had a life. Every claim of happiness was backed by a stunningly beautiful picture – that made every onlooker want a life like that. Worse still, it made smoking look like a fun activity – not a product that could kill.

REPETITION – THE SECOND WEAPON
The power of advertising lies in the power of repetition and the advertising industry has used this weapon to hijack the minds of young & old alike for years. Advertisers spend billions of dollars planting slogans in our minds. No wonder when it comes to safety, the fi rst car one thinks of is “Volvo”. “Just do it” said in any context always brings to mind “Nike”. Advertising man and author Kenneth Goode wrote, “The greatest of all advertising tricks is that of persistently pounding away at the same suggestion while still keeping the appearance of freshness of idea.” So while the message remained the same, the tobacco companies used a variety of carefully picked images to drive home the point – that it was “cool” to smoke.

According to recent estimates, tobacco companies were spending close to 34 million dollars everyday on advertising. Talk of repetition – they were using every conceivable form of media to reach out to their target audience and repeatedly convince them into believing the “cool” quotient of their product. A survey conducted in 2002 revealed that 86% of childhood smokers favour Camel, Marlboro and Newport cigarettes – the most heavily advertised brands. The mantra was simple - double your advertising revenue if you want to double your sales. In the nineties, Joe Camel Company increased their ad campaign from $27 million to $43 million, capturing shares of over 50% of youth smokers. Interestingly though, their share in the adult market remained practically unchanged. It’s the children who fall prey to these tactics – they are the softest target. According to Naomi Klein’s famous book No Logo, “…poor neighborhoods have a disproportionately high number of billboards selling tobacco and hard liquor products… the ads always feature models sailing, skiing, playing golf, making these addictive products particularly glamorous to kids stuck in the ghetto longing for escape.”

THE LURE OF FREE – THE THIRD WEAPON
In 1998, when several laws were passed in America curbing the vast reach of these companies, they changed their game plan. Being restricted from showing their ads in various places - tobacco companies had to cut down their ad spending drastically. The money they saved thus was used in giving free cigarettes and price discounts to retailers – making the problem even more serious. Not only were the cigarettes displayed prominently in stores, but now they were more affordable. That glamorous life you saw in the ads could be yours – at a lesser cost. The list of freebies kept increasing. So now tobacco companies included T-shirts, CD player & bags as promotional items. So even if you did not buy the product, you still used the “brand” and were aware of it. Even though one saw less of advertisements, one never failed to see the “brand names”.

BEATING THEM IN THEIR OWN GAME
Joe Camel uses the cartoon image of Camel to make its products look harmless and sometimes even look like it’s suitable for children. A research done by American Federal Trade Commission found that 86% of kids aged 10 to 17 recognized the character Joe Camel. Shocking! With so much spending power and such strong image marketing, is there any way one can beat these tobacco companies?

Absolutely. If “images” is what they were playing with all these years, then it was these images, which were used by some to several the true meaning behind these glamorous ads. So “Adbusters”, the Canadian magazine, altered the images and slogans of popular advertisements to show the correct pictures. Absolut Vodka and its series of advertisements changed to Absolut Death. “Ultra Cool” became “Utter Fool”. It did make you laugh & smile, but it drove home the point too.

With most of the products being more – or – less similar, today it’s “images” that make or change people’s perceptions. GM filed for bankruptcy a few days back, which changed people’s perception about the company & its products. On Wednesday (3rd June), the company was ready with its ads; educating people about its future plans. The 60-second spot promised viewers leaner, greener, faster cars. After all, it claimed, “This it not about going out of business; this is about getting down to business.” If it really wanted to survive, it certainly needed a positive image.

In this game of images, putting those horrendous scary pictures on cigarette packets might work. Some may shout themselves hoarse that this was too much intrusion by the government, but it’s time we did something about it. May be the adult smokers might not get affected much, but the young could be deterred from getting addicted.

Advertisers & marketers hold tremendous power in their hands and we made sure that power was in the right hands. It’s time we took to task people who misuse this power. It’s time we started advertising responsibly.